The subrime mess: Did it really start eight years ago:
October 7th, 2008 Categories: Mortgage and Loans, Sacramento Home Buyers
One of my partners found an interesting article recently. Like many of us I have been doing a lot of asking around, reading and trying to learn more about the beginnings of this mess we’re experiencing with the credit sector… My buddy sent an email with an article from the New York Times from almost exactly eight years ago…
What happened was the greed of the secondary market and wall street fed a hunger for more product…
Who was supposed to be regulating this?
This may be interesting to read:
September 30, 1999
Fannie Mae Eases Credit
To Aid Mortgage Lending
By STEVEN A. HOLMES
In a move that could help increase home ownership, the Fannie
Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on
loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders.
The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving
24 banks in 15 markets – including the New York
metropolitan region — will encourage those banks to
extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is
generally not good enough to qualify for conventional
loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a
nationwide program by next spring.
Fannie Mae, the nation’s biggest underwriter of home
mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the
Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among
low and moderate income people and felt pressure from
stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.
In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage
companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them
make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These
borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are
not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can
only get loans from finance companies that charge much
higher interest rates — anywhere from three to four
percentage points higher than conventional loans.
‘Fannie Mae has expanded home ownership for millions
of families in the 1990′s by reducing down payment
requirements,’ said Franklin D. Raines, Fannie Mae’s
chairman and chief ex ecutive officer. ‘Yet there remain
too many borrowers whose credit is just a notch below
what our underwriting has required who have been relegate
to paying significantly higher mortgage rates in the so-called
subprime market.’ Demographic information on these borrowers
is sketchy.
But at least one study indicates that 18 percent of the loans
in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared
to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional loan market. In
moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending,
Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may
not pose any difficulties during flush economic times.
But the government-subsidized corporation may run into
trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a
government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan
industry in the 1980′s.
“From the perspective of many people,
including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,’
said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
‘If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out
the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.’
Under Fannie Mae’s pilot program, consumers who qualify can secure a
mortgage with an interest rate one percentage point above that of a
conventional, 30-year fixed rate mortgage of less than $240,000 — a
rate that currently averages about 7.76 per cent. If the borrower
makes his or her monthly payments on time for two years, the one
percentage point premium is dropped.
Fannie Mae, the nation’s biggest underwriter of home mortgages,
does not lend money directly to consumers. Instead, it purchases
loans that banks make on what is called the secondary market. By
expanding the type of loans that it will buy, Fannie Mae is hoping to
spur banks to make more loans to people with less-than-stellar credit
ratings.








